Discover how to integrate the Model Context Protocol (MCP) into your DevRel Copilot for real-time data fetch, secure action workflows, and seamless AI-driven developer automation.
RAG Alone vs. MCP + RAG:
“Show me the latest failing CI tests for feature/xyz branch and open an issue?”This ensures developers get both historical context and live updates in one place.
Without MCP: DevRel Copilot can direct a user to documentation, forum posts, or GitHub issues but cannot perform any operations.
With MCP: The Copilot can call an MCP server to:
Benefit: Developers experience an end-to-end workflow— ask, retrieve, and act —without leaving the Copilot interface.
Multiple Data Sources:
{
"name": "github:get_open_issues",
"arguments": { "repo": "my-org/my-repo", "labels": ["bug", "help wanted"] }
}
To integrate MCP servers into your DevRel Copilot, follow these steps:
Documentation Service: Expose a Docs MCP that can:
Fetch a specific API endpoint’s documentation page.
Search within docs for a keyword.
Return last-modified timestamp.
Code Repository Service: Build a GitHub MCP to:
List open issues or PRs.
Create, update, or merge pull requests.
Fetch code snippets or file contents.
Issue Tracker Service: Develop a Jira (or GitHub Issues) MCP to:
Create a ticket with title, description, and attachments.
Transition issue statuses (e.g., “To Do” → “In Progress”).
Fetch issue comments or labels.
Forum & Community Service: Implement a Forum MCP for:
Searching threads by tags or keywords.
Retrieving the top answers or comments.
Posting replies on behalf of the Copilot (with user approval).
CI/CD Service: Create a CI MCP to:
Query the status of the latest build pipeline.
Download build logs or test reports.
Rerun tests or trigger deployments.
Transport Protocols:
HTTP + SSE (Server-Sent Events): Good for streaming incremental updates (e.g., live build logs).
WebSockets: Preferred for bi-directional, low-latency interactions—ideal when the Copilot and MCP server need continuous back-and-forth messaging.
Plain HTTP/REST Mode: Available in MCP spec v1.1+ for simple request/response patterns. Choose this for stateless, high-throughput calls (e.g., fetching doc pages).
Hosting Options:
Local Deployment: MCP servers run on developer machines (useful for internal DevRel testing).
Containerized Deployment: Package each MCP server as a Docker image. Deploy behind a Kubernetes cluster or managed container service for scalability.
Managed MCP Hosting: Services like mcp.run or Anthropic MCP Host offer one-click MCP hosting, reducing DevEx friction.
Security is paramount when your DevRel Copilot can perform write operations. Follow these guidelines:
OAuth 2.1 Integration:
Client-Side Flow: The Copilot (or user’s browser) goes through an OAuth consent flow, granting the MCP server specific scopes (e.g., “repo:read”
, “repo:write”
).
JWT-Based Session Tokens: After OAuth, the MCP server issues a short-lived JWT tied to the user’s identity. All subsequent MCP calls must present this JWT.
Fine-Grained Scopes & Least Privilege:
Docs MCP: Scope docs:read-only.
GitHub MCP: Scopes repo:read, repo:write, issues:read, issues:write. Avoid granting “admin” scope unless absolutely necessary.
Jira MCP: Scopes jira:project-read, jira:issue-create.
Session Management:
Bind each session ID to a unique JWT. Ensure that only the token owner’s data is accessible.
Use a shared cache or database (e.g., Redis) to manage active sessions for horizontal scaling.
Token Rotation & Revocation:
Set JWT expiration to a short interval (e.g., 15–30 minutes).
Provide a revocation endpoint to immediately terminate compromised tokens.
Integrating MCP introduces new attack surfaces. Here’s how to mitigate risks:
Strict Command Whitelisting: Only allow the AI Copilot to call predefined MCP methods (e.g., "github:create_pr"
, "jira:create_issue"
).
User Approval Workflows:
Copilot proposes an action (e.g., “I am about to open a PR with these changes. Do you approve?”).
User clicks “Approve” or “Reject.”
Only upon approval does the Copilot call the MCP method.
Action Confirmation Logs: Maintain an immutable audit log: who approved, when, and what payload was executed.
HTTPS & TLS Everywhere: All MCP endpoints must use HTTPS with TLS 1.2+. Disable insecure ciphers.
Token Scope Enforcement: On the MCP server, validate that each JWT’s scopes match the requested action. If a JWT has only repo:read, reject attempts to create a PR.
Rate Limiting & Throttling:
Set sensible rate limits on MCP servers (e.g., 100 calls per minute per user).
Implement exponential backoff on the client side if rate limits are exceeded.
Input Sanitization: Carefully validate all parameters—especially free-text fields (e.g., issue description)—to avoid injection attacks.
Third-Party MCP Vetting: If using community MCP servers (e.g., from an MCP registry):
Check digital signatures; verify the publisher.
Execute untrusted MCP servers in sandboxed environments (e.g., gVisor, Firecracker).
Conduct periodic security audits.
Centralized Logging: Ship MCP server logs (access logs, error logs, audit logs) to a centralized SIEM (e.g., Splunk, Elastic).
Anomaly Detection: Set alerts for suspicious patterns—e.g., a sudden spike in “create_issue” calls or repeated OAuth token failures.
User Notifications: Notify users in-app or via email if their tokens show anomalous activity (e.g., attempts to call MCP methods they didn’t issue).
Designing a seamless RAG + MCP experience involves several architectural patterns:
Use Case Example: “Show me the latest version of API X.”
Decision Logic:
If the requested doc was updated within the last 24 hours, use the Docs MCP to fetch the freshest HTML/Markdown.
Otherwise, fall back to the RAG pipeline (embedding-based) for speed and lower cost.
Implementation:
Check Metadata: Store last_modified timestamps alongside each vector embedding.
Conditional Fetch: If current_time – last_modified < 24h, call docs-mcp:get_page(repo, path); else, run search_embeddings(query)
.
Use Case Example: “Identify all open bugs labeled ‘high-priority,’ then create a summary issue in Jira.”
Step 1 (RAG): Use RAG to fetch the list of open bugs from documentation or a static bug registry (if such a list exists in your knowledge base).
Step 2 (MCP): Call github:get_open_issues(repo, labels=[“bug”, “high-priority”]).
Step 3 (MCP): Aggregate results and call jira:create_issue(project="DEVREL", summary="High-Priority Bugs", description=)
.
Implementation Tip: Manage session context so that the Copilot retains state between steps, passing relevant variables (e.g., list of issue IDs) downstream.
Use Case Example: “Automatically merge pull requests that pass all tests and have 2 approvals.”
Step 1 (MCP): Call ci:get_latest_ci_status(build_id)
. If tests passed, proceed.
Step 2 (MCP): Call github:get_pr_reviews(pr_id)
. Check for at least two “approved” reviews.
Step 3 (Human Confirmation): Prompt user: “PR #1234 has passed tests and has two approvals. Merge now?”
Step 4 (MCP): Upon confirmation, call github:merge_pr(pr_id)
.
Benefit: Balances automation with human oversight—critical for high-stakes DevRel tasks (e.g., releasing major documentation updates).
Pain Point: No centralized “MCP Marketplace” for discovering vetted MCP servers (e.g., github-mcp, jira-mcp, forums-mcp).
Industry Effort:
Emerging Registries: Projects like mcp.run and Glama’s MCP Hub aim to catalog popular MCP servers with user ratings and version histories.
Official MCP Package Index: In the works—an npm/PyPI–style registry specifically for MCP servers. Each package lists metadata (publisher, version, supported scopes).
Pain Point: Setting up MCP servers currently requires dev skills (Docker, OAuth config, environment variables).
Industry Effort:
Connector Wizards: DevRel Copilot platforms are adding graphical wizards to guide users through OAuth consent, scope selection, and one-click MCP server deployment.
Hosted “DevRel MCP Suites”: Bund